To: Just mythoughts
False dichotomy. Most of the "Es" on this forum are God-fearing types. We simply don't subscribe to a literal interpretation of Genesis as it flies in the face of the physical evidence.
59 posted on
12/19/2004 5:09:33 AM PST by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: Junior
"False dichotomy. Most of the "Es" on this forum are God-fearing types. We simply don't subscribe to a literal interpretation of Genesis as it flies in the face of the physical evidence."
That is the most curious statement, "GOD-fearing types".
Which "GOD", you know we are told there are two, and we are even told that one rebelled before 'man' was ever created in the flesh.
Peter plainly tells us that there are THREE heaven and earth AGES. The Bible is the story of the ADAM his children and those with whom they came in contact with and yet we are told that these things happened as an ensample (example) for our admonition (warning) upon whom the ends of the world (AGE) are come.
We are told that our remembrance of OLD TIME is removed from us, there is nothing new under the sun.
To: Junior
We simply don't subscribe to a literal interpretation of Genesis as it flies in the face of the physical evidence. There is no physical evidence you can produce that argues against the account in Genesis. The spin you associate with the evidence is something else altogether.
230 posted on
12/20/2004 3:22:26 AM PST by
Havoc
(Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson