This isn't hard. Infering something does not make it true, at best it makes the inference a possibility. The mere notion of the possibility does not make it fact. Yet this is exactly what you are trying to pull - the bunch of you. Lee H. Oswald didn't act alone. The evidence is there to support it, so I infer it. That alone doesn't make it true. How you can't see that is beyond me save that God has truly blinded you so that you'll believe your own lies. You can't otherwise be that stupid.
I'm glad to hear that. Maybe you will answer the question now.
I can make the question simpler. If your brother is arrested for murder and there are no other witnesses, which do you believe, fingerprints plus powder burns on your brother's hand plus a videotape, or your brother's testimony that he didn't do it?