Geez, someone asks you for evidence of a 'soul' and you go ballistic. Guess you don't like being exposed as someone without support for your positions.
The guy doesn't understand - has no concept of proof or evidentiary value. He states something as a fact then thinks because he could infer it, it's true and when called on it, he is more bothered by proof of a soul than by his vacancy of any reality with regard to proof.. Yeah, I'm more than a bit mad; cause you poor excuses are seeing that trash taught in the schools with more impact than you know and I have neices and nephews that are going to have to deal with this pack of fraud soon. It's a travesty and you morons can't even see it. There's room to believe there was fraud in the election, the vote was close, therfore Bush cheated. I infered that. Absent any other evidentiary support, you can't prove me wrong. You can postulate any number of outcomes; but, you can niether prove nor disprove my hypothesis and I get to teach it as true. How's that. Figure maybe if I hit you where you believe it might register - nah.
He also goes off on his "Stalin" and/or "Hitler" ties when he gets into a corner. Mostly he just goes off.