[Havoc]

All those terrible things really started happening around the time we sent men to the moon. Coincidence? Think about it!

No, the data doesn't track that way. That's 5 years after the spike begins. Care to try something else?

[WildTurkey]

No, the data doesn't track that way. That's 5 years after the spike begins. Care to try something else?

Hmm. Must be something else as they started teaching evolution way before the "spike".

[PatrickHenry]

Me:
All those terrible things [premarital sex, babies out of wedlock, abortions, etc] really started happening around the time we sent men to the moon. Coincidence? Think about it!

You:
No, the data doesn't track that way. That's 5 years after the spike begins. Care to try something else?

Ah, but the moon-landing program began earlier. The corelation is precise!

[VadeRetro]

No, the data doesn't track that way. That's 5 years after the spike begins. Care to try something else?

Are you capable of understanding that the argument--a precise echo of your own--would be a fallacy, would be bad reasoning, would be wrong, would be a stupid argument, even if the spikes matched perfectly?

I wish I could tell you that you're doing Creation Science wrong, but the problem I have with Creation Science is that you are doing it right.