Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Nearly half of all Americans support restricting rights of Muslim-Americans
WLBT ^ | December 17, 2004 | AP

Posted on 12/17/2004 3:57:13 PM PST by yonif

ITHACA, N.Y. A nationwide poll finds nearly half of all Americans believe the U-S government should restrict the civil liberties of Muslim Americans.

The survey -- conducted this fall by Cornell University -- found that 44 percent favored at least some restrictions, while 48 percent said civil liberties shouldn't be restricted in any way.

Twenty-seven percent of the 715 respondents supported requiring all Muslim-Americans to register where they lived -- and 29 percent thought agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer groups.

The poll also found Republicans and people who described themselves as highly religious were more likely to support curtailing Muslims' civil liberties than Democrats or people who are less religious.

The executive director of the Muslim American Society says the news is disturbing, but not surprising.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: america; islam; muslimamericans; muslims; religionofpeace; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 361-377 next last
To: happygrl
Thank you ~ so many people forget the Nestorians. There were other Christians as well, and Jewish missionaries had been hard at work out in the mountainous areas of Central Asia for centuries!

I'm absolutely amazed that we've been at war to one degree or another in Afghanistan for 3 years now and we still have Freepers who seem to have absolutely no idea of the history of the place (or places).

181 posted on 12/17/2004 6:34:44 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
Yes. It is that thing behind it.

I think it is...I have always had an eye for it...was born that way..I could be wrong...but I could be right...

182 posted on 12/17/2004 6:35:31 PM PST by weenie (Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I agree-----a very slippery slope. Most of the Muslim problem could be solved by better intelligence .......

Of course, it all depends on how you define a "civil liberty".

This article defines "infiltrating a Muslim group" as a violation of a civil liberty.

Thus, you have a situation where the methods used to obtain "better intelligence" is defined as "you are violating Muslim civil rights".

I have no problem whatsoever with the FBI "infiltrating" any group I or any of my family belong to as long as the FBI agents pay their membership dues on time. We have nothing to hide and anyone is welcome to During the early 1960's, the joke was that half of the membership of the KKK consisted of Government agents.

Why should it be that infiltrating white supremacist hate groups such as the KKK is considered enforcing civil rights while infiltrating Muslim hate groups is considered a violation of civil rights?

183 posted on 12/17/2004 6:35:39 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You guys are a bunch of unreconstructed Southern Confederate sympathizers.

Uh... Mu... Dr. Jekyl.. Mr. Hyde?

You are joking, I hope?
184 posted on 12/17/2004 6:35:47 PM PST by broadsword (When Islam creeps into a human society, oppression, misogyny and terror come hard on its heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Does that "unreconstructed Southern Confederate sympathizers" description also apply to me?

I wanna play but I'm an Australian.


185 posted on 12/17/2004 6:36:08 PM PST by Fred Nerks (understand evil. Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD on pdf. Click Fred Nerks for link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: yonif

This is very encouraging.


186 posted on 12/17/2004 6:36:39 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I guess you're invited. LOL!


187 posted on 12/17/2004 6:37:03 PM PST by broadsword (When Islam creeps into a human society, oppression, misogyny and terror come hard on its heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: honest2God
If we intern and deport Muslims here, what does that say to the governments that we are trying to build in Iraq and Afghanistan? What does that say to our troops who are trying to establish good relations with the populace while rooting out the terrorists.

Studiously avoid anything that would make us think you are jihadis.

How hard is that?

188 posted on 12/17/2004 6:37:07 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

HOW HARD IS THAT?!

Now I'm ROTFLMBO!


189 posted on 12/17/2004 6:38:57 PM PST by Fred Nerks (understand evil. Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD on pdf. Click Fred Nerks for link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Let me clarify: these same kids were allowed to sing these same songs (no 'real' Christmas songs, this was a "winter concert") in the auditorium for two days for two sets of parents, prior to the field trip. Now, admittedly, I got this information from my seven year old, but the teacher did acknowledge that these three children would not be attending the field trip to the American legion. My daughter asked one of the kids why he couldn't go and he said (I paraphrase)'my mother doesn't want me to visit American soldiers because they hurt muslims'. This may just be these particular parents. Perhaps in other classes going on this field trip, there was no problem. I can only speak to what happened in my daughter's class. I think its pretty clear it was the American Legion that stuck in the craw, not the music.


190 posted on 12/17/2004 6:39:04 PM PST by ariamne (reformed liberal and Shieldmaiden of the Infidels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
Look here Broadsword, I never claimed the Mongols in Mongolia were ever predominantly Christian.

However, when the Mongols conquered most of the civilized world back in the Middle Ages, they frequently adopted the religions of the people they conquered. For instance, Confucianism was quickly adopted by the Mongol rulers of the three Chinese kingdoms, and down in India the Moguls became Moslem!

The fellows who stayed back in Mongolia proper were the dregs of their society. The place is still backwards, folks running yaks, doing subsistance hunting, all that sort of stuff. They are doomed to the fatalism inherent in Buddhism.

The more aggressive sort of folk left there 800 years ago and never turned back!

191 posted on 12/17/2004 6:39:10 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: honest2God
Now, it is different if you want to discuss MOST OF THE CONFLICTS THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO THE UNITED STATES. In that case, yes, most of the conflicts that are relevant to our strategic interests involve Muslims. Does that make you happy?

Yes, of course it makes me happy, since I am most concerned with my country. If one is concerned with the future of one's country, how could it be any other way?

And Merry Christmas to you.

192 posted on 12/17/2004 6:40:15 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: honest2God
Suicide bombing was acutally pioneered by the Tamil Tigers, who are Hindu.

Nope. Suicide bombing was pioneered by the Japanese in WWII, almost all of whom were members of the Shinto religion. Those suicide bombers however were not quite terrorists as they chose to wear a uniform, carry arms openly, and attack only military targets. Today I think they would be called terrorists though as they were intending to cause terror in their intended targets -- just as we call the suicide bombing of the USS Cole a "suicide bombing" and consider it an act of terrorism.

193 posted on 12/17/2004 6:40:47 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I never mentioned anyone in custody. I was referring to a policy of interning and deporting ALL Muslims as a matter of policy. That after all, is what the poll in question in this thread is about. My apologies if I am mistaken.


194 posted on 12/17/2004 6:41:04 PM PST by honest2God
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

"Suicide bombing was pioneered by the Japanese in WWII"

Haha, ok, ok, that is true. I meant in the form in which we see today, but point well taken.


195 posted on 12/17/2004 6:42:21 PM PST by honest2God
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

You're from the REALLY DEEP SOUF', of course.


196 posted on 12/17/2004 6:42:27 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn; MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; Smartass; LiberalBassTurds; Travis McGee


Reciprocal rights with Islamic tourists, workers, and even American Muslim citizens in the USA.

If their Islamic home country bans Christians and Jews from having churches, synogogues, bibles, worship, prayers, religious jewelry, clothing, and/or traditions or practices on penalty of arrest, imprisonment, torture, public beheadings, or expulsion from the country then ALL Muslims in the USA are subject to the same religious and governmental laws in reverse the instant they disembark from any plane, ship, train, vehicle, or sneak walking across the Mexican or Canadian border.

No foolin' Mohammed!

You want religious/official laws like you had back home you've got it!


197 posted on 12/17/2004 6:43:10 PM PST by devolve (http://pro.lookingat.us/ElvisChristmas.html http://pro.lookingat.us/TheKing.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

"Studiously avoid anything that would make us think you are jihadis."

HAHA! Now THAT is sound policy! Well said.


198 posted on 12/17/2004 6:45:19 PM PST by honest2God
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: honest2God

Now you have identified what it is that frightens you the most. Deportation. Reminds me of a discussion I had recently with a muslim. I reminded him that what is GIVEN can also BE TAKEN AWAY!

That sorta spoiled his day.


199 posted on 12/17/2004 6:45:20 PM PST by Fred Nerks (understand evil. Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD on pdf. Click Fred Nerks for link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Drango
"the US government should restrict the Civil Liberties of Muslim Americans"

Depends on how you define "restrict the Civil Liberties of" doesn't it? There are those who would claim that asking for a picture ID at a polling place is restricting the civil liberties of undocumented migrants who may want to vote.

200 posted on 12/17/2004 6:45:54 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 361-377 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson