To: bondserv
Imagine schools of the future slighting or ignoring Newton or Galileo, but paying homage to Avicenna and Muhammed as the fathers of science. Imagine Christianity and Judaism being ignored or condemned as anti-intellectual. Visualize the educational laws of the future forbidding the teaching of both atheistic Darwinism and Christian (European/American) science in the science class, but extolling the work of Arab scholars. Imagine them recounting for students selective horrors committed by Europe and Israel in their conflicts with Muslims, but sweeping under the rug centuries of atrocities committed with the sword of Allah. Would this be an improvement on the current tyranny of naturalistic science in the schools? Is this the kind of new politically-correct philosophy of science that Nature will promote after the fall of the current idol, Charles Darwin? Will Sagan, the popularizer of atheistic science, be eclipsed by Sezgin, the popularizer of Islamic science? Just when you thought things couldnt get any worse, you find the devil is clever.Nobody, but nobody, beats David Coppedge for insane creationist conspiracy theories.
Yep, Nature ran a politically correct review of medieval Muslim contributions to science because they know that Darwinism has crumbled, and they're searching for a new evil dogma to push.
David, I say you should run with this concern. Run with it like your life depended on it! Dig up every example of modern mainstream science saying anything complimentary about Muslims in any context, and show the world how this is just another part of Satan's plot to transfer our alliegiance from the evil Charles Darwin (now that you've triumphantly vanquished him) to the evil Muhammed.
47 posted on
12/17/2004 12:20:47 PM PST by
jennyp
(Latest creation/evolution news: http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: jennyp
"
Imagine Christianity and Judaism being ignored or condemned as anti-intellectual.
Visualize the educational laws of the future forbidding the teaching of both atheistic Darwinism and Christian (European/American) science in the science class, but extolling the work of Arab scholars.
Imagine them recounting for students selective horrors committed by Europe and Israel in their conflicts with Muslims, but sweeping under the rug centuries of atrocities committed with the sword of Allah.
I am visualizing poor Mr. Coppedge lying awake at three in the morning imagining demons and conjuring conspiracies. Makes you wonder about his coffee intake.
51 posted on
12/17/2004 12:50:24 PM PST by
atlaw
To: jennyp
Nobody, but nobody, beats David Coppedge for insane creationist conspiracy theories. I am sure Dr. Hovind would be disappointed in your change of heart.
Yep, Nature ran a politically correct review of medieval Muslim contributions to science because they know that Darwinism has crumbled, and they're searching for a new evil dogma to push. David, I say you should run with this concern. Run with it like your life depended on it! Dig up every example of modern mainstream science saying anything complimentary about Muslims in any context, and show the world how this is just another part of Satan's plot to transfer our alliegiance from the evil Charles Darwin (now that you've triumphantly vanquished him) to the evil Muhammed.
You underestimate the determination of the Liberal extremists. Nature has chosen to take sides, watch the "Hard Science" departments at the Universities follow suit in the coming years.
55 posted on
12/17/2004 1:06:56 PM PST by
bondserv
(Alignment is critical! † [Check out my profile page])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson