[Dog Gone]

I think it's pretty weak. They are basing it essentially on one false statement made by a prosecution witness out of thousands, and on something that wouldn't have impressed me in the least as a juror or judge.

There's no interest in Texas in retrying this case, nor any compelling legal reason to require it.

When the political reasons and the legal reasons align, it's usually a slam dunk.

[Xenalyte]

The radio newscasters were spinning it like this is the crucial point on which the case hinged, that the jurors mostly decided she planned it based on a "Law and Order" episode that never aired. It sounded a little weak to me.