Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; 2banana
I purposefully paid zero attention to the Peterson case -- went out of my way to avoid it -- because it raised a number of key questions that no one wanted to address. I found that very frustrating.

This is one of them. How on earth can a society say it's OK for a mother to abort -- kill -- her fetus, yet's it's murder if the father or someone else does it? Actually, if the father can be guilty of murder for killing his fetus, then why doesn't that apply to doctors who abort fetuses?

It simply is an untenable position for the legal system to take.

4 posted on 12/14/2004 10:08:34 AM PST by Wolfstar (Counting down the days to when the new White House puppy arrives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar
How on earth can a society say it's OK for a mother to abort -- kill -- her fetus, yet's it's murder if the father or someone else does it? Actually, if the father can be guilty of murder for killing his fetus, then why doesn't that apply to doctors who abort fetuses?

Allow me to explain, whether an unborn baby is a human life or not is determined solely by whether it is wanted by the biological mother, or both the biological mother and father. If it is not wanted it is a fetus, a pregnancy to be 'terminated', a glob of cells, an undesired consequence to a specific desired behavior, an inconvenience to be eliminated.

There now doesn't that make perfect sense?/sarcasm

8 posted on 12/14/2004 10:21:27 AM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson