Not here to support the homosexual agenda.
1. original article - robbery appeared to be the motive all along
2. reply from xm177e2 - Robberies generally don't end up with the victim tortured to death
3. visualops - 10 examples of robberies ending in torture
4. trisham - based on 10 examples, conclusion - robberies generally end in torture
5. I disagreed. Robberies don't generally end in torture.
6. Clint N. Suhks - LFM support the homosexual agenda.
I stand by my statement - robberies don't generally end in torture unto death. And that means I support the homosexual agenda?
If jumping to conclusions were an olympic sport, you just qualified... Ok with you if I still pray for those I know trapped in the homosexual lie?
And you've made no effort to support those anecdotal "facts" when methamphetamine is involved. "The Methamphetamine abuser remains awake for days, and as the high begins to wear off, the individual enters the tweaking stage and is prone to violence, delusions, and paranoia." Try googling "methamphetamine, rage, murder" and about 30 or so Matthew Shepard articles pop up...see any correlation there? Now you go on and keep pushing the homosexual propagandist victimhood side of the murder and you'll remain the monkey with its hand over its ears.
xm177e2 - Robberies generally don't end up with the victim tortured to death
xm177e2 tried to make it sound like a stretch to say that the robbery was the motive for assault. The case was made that it happens more often than people want to acknowledge (even if it does not hold to the majority of robberies).