Your first post concluded
Want to go back and read my first post? This should make it easier:
I will go with the original - Robberies generally don't end up with the victim tortured to death. According to FBI numbers, there were 400,000+ robberies in 2000. I think we would hear a lot more about it if those robbed were 'generally...tortured to death'.
I made no value judgments for/against homosexuals, and still don't understand why you tore off after me...
Perhaps you've not followed the entire thread.
Your statement supports xm177e2’s conclusion that it was a hate crime and Shepard was tortured because he was homosexual. At no point in the ABC article does it support this homosexual propaganda myth. xm177e2 made that conclusion because robberies generally don’t end in torture; one doesn't follow the other. It does not prove that because robberies don’t generally end in torture that this must have been torture. It also doesn’t address McKinney’s state of mind which you continue to ignore.
When you make statements like Generally, robbery does not end in torture. In this case, it may certainly have , it is an affirmation to xm177e2’s erroneous conclusion.
But, if I tore into wrongly I apologize.