Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delta 4-Heavy rocket poised for debut today
SpaceFlight.com ^ | 11 December 2004 | Justin Ray

Posted on 12/11/2004 9:53:40 AM PST by Rockitz

Delta 4-Heavy rocket poised for debut today America's new heavy-lifting rocket takes its much-anticipated test flight today. Boeing's inaugural Delta 4-Heavy rocket is scheduled to make its thunderous departure from Cape Canaveral's pad 37B at 2:31 p.m. EST (1931 GMT) while riding 1.9-million pounds of fiery thrust generated by its three hydrogen-fueled engines.


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: California; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: boeing; deltaiv; heavylift; mars; moon; rocket; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Inaugural Delta IV Heavy launch scrubbed for today. We'll try again tomorrow.
1 posted on 12/11/2004 9:53:40 AM PST by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I was able to obtain the first exclusive photos!


2 posted on 12/11/2004 9:57:12 AM PST by Shortwave (Supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shortwave
It was pointing the wrong way, once they fix that it'll be good to go.


3 posted on 12/11/2004 9:58:49 AM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

LOL... you don't want to be in that pickup truck when those engines ignite


4 posted on 12/11/2004 9:59:56 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Been a long year of tests....

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bls/d4heavy/d4h_milestones.html

5 posted on 12/11/2004 9:59:58 AM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Its great to be able to do the same heavy lifting that the 1960's era Saturn 5 could do 35 years later..and not have to depend on the obsolete shuttles...
6 posted on 12/11/2004 10:00:25 AM PST by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

LOL...........I don't know WHERE you find that stuff.


7 posted on 12/11/2004 10:01:03 AM PST by Howlin (W, Still the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Wonder how thrust compares to the great Saturn V?


8 posted on 12/11/2004 10:01:34 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

LMAO!


9 posted on 12/11/2004 10:01:52 AM PST by Shortwave (Supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Testing the arrestor cables?


10 posted on 12/11/2004 10:06:17 AM PST by Mike Fieschko (Ahh, good old NAES Lakehurst. http://vusn.org/naec/naec.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shortwave

The test flight is coincidental. Today I just saw a Gilligan's Island (the REAL one) where a NASA satellite crashed on the island. The photos sent back to NASA of Gilligan gave NASA the impression that they landed on Mars! (Thank God for Tina Louise!)


11 posted on 12/11/2004 10:09:55 AM PST by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shortwave

I guess it is bigger in person.


12 posted on 12/11/2004 10:12:00 AM PST by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan

This is tiny compared to the Saturn V. It looks like it has 1.9 million pounds of thrust compared to the Saturn's 7.5 million.

Still a nice vehicle to have for putting big stuff in earth orbit.


13 posted on 12/11/2004 10:14:35 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Wish me a Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Tar and feathers wasn't it?


14 posted on 12/11/2004 10:15:13 AM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Back to the drawing board...

Today's maiden flight of the Boeing Delta 4-Heavy rocket was scrubbed because of trouble with the master sequencer that controls the crucial final seconds of the countdown.

As fueling operations got underway this morning at Cape Canaveral's pad 37B, engineers reported a problem with the Terminal Countdown Sequencer Rack computer system. Known as TCSR, this sequencer assumes control of the countdown at T-minus 8.5 seconds, overseeing ignition of the RS-68 main engines and verifying the Rocketdyne powerplants rev up to full throttle before committing the 1.6-million-pound vehicle to flight.

A 7-person troubleshooting crew was dispatched to the pad's telemetry room as officials hoped to resolve the problem. Loading of the rocket with super-cold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen was put on hold while the team worked at the pad.

After working a couple of hours on the problem, the decision was made to postpone the mission until Sunday.

"At this time we would like to proceed with a scrub to today's operation," the Boeing launch director told the chief launch conductor. "The main activity for the rest of the day, of course, will be to address the problem at hand."

High-altitude winds and gusty surface winds were concerns during today's countdown, too.

Assuming the sequencer issue can fixed by Sunday, countdown clocks will start early tomorrow morning for a fresh launch attempt. Liftoff will be possible between 2:32 to 5:28 p.m. EST (1932-2228 GMT).

Air Force meteorologists predict a 70 percent chance of good weather during the window with just some scattered clouds at 3,000 feet, visibility of 10 miles, northwesterly winds from 300 degrees at 10 gusting to 15 knots and a temperature of 64 degrees F.


15 posted on 12/11/2004 10:17:38 AM PST by Stars N Stripes (When a 20 footer sneaks up like a ton a lead, an the crest comes along and slaps um up side the head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
What? Someone pull the wrong pin? Fall down, go boom? (as opposed to BOOOM!!!) ;>)

How do they erect the vehicle from that position? Seriously. Anybody got a manual?

/john

16 posted on 12/11/2004 10:28:09 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Textide
Been a long year of tests....

...plus a few hurricanes.

17 posted on 12/11/2004 10:55:39 AM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
Last Dakotan asked "Wonder how thrust compares to the great Saturn V?"

The main engine has already flown on the Delta IV Medium, it is the Rocketdyne RS-68, in the Delta IV heavy configuration it uses 2 of the same stages as a first stage. RS-68 total thrust is about 750,000 lbs. in vacuum, so total is 1,000,000 lbs. That is equal to the F1 used on the Saturn V, the Saturn V had 5 for a total of 7,500,000 lbs. of thrust in vacuum. This rocket is similar to the Saturn IB used to send the Apollo's to Skylab.

URL's:
Delta IV Large:http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/dellarge.htm
Saturn V:http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnv.htm
Saturn IB:http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnib.htm
18 posted on 12/11/2004 11:17:51 AM PST by fallujah-nuker (I like Ike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker

OOPs, I meant 1,500,000 lbs. total thrust!


19 posted on 12/11/2004 11:19:09 AM PST by fallujah-nuker (I like Ike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker; Last Dakotan

Actually, DIV Heavy uses three Common Booster Cores (CBCs). The two strap-ons CBCs and the core run at full power level for the first minute, then the core CBC throttles back to ~60% for the next ~3 minutes, and then the strap-ons separate and the remaining CBC throttles up to full power level for the last ~2 minutes. Sea level thrust is probably a more appropriate classification of a booster engine such as the RS-68. The lift-off thrust is closer to the ~1.9 Mlbs of thrust.

Excuse my use of ~. I know the correct values, but I don't know what's in print if you catch my drift.

Hope that helps your comparison.


20 posted on 12/11/2004 12:17:10 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson