The article I posted contained statements by the doctors and hospital who actually treated him.
Something is very fishy about this.
When he was being treated, back at the end of September, the doctors did the tests and treated him, and came out and said that he was NOT poisoned.
Now, two months later he goes back for more tests and they suddenly discover, that he was poisoned after all?
Were these doctors lying then, or are they lying now?
I tend to believe what they said the first time, when he was there to be diagnosed and treated.
Unfortunately I am too busy *and* too disorganized to find the article(s) saying that the statement from the clinic/hospital/doctors claiming that there was no evidence of poisoning was false, did not come from the clinic/hospital/doctors at all but from another source, claiming it was from the clinic etc.
I have read every thread and article about this situation; maybe try a search. Apparently (from what else has been posted here) the statement that there was no poisoning was a lie, made to appear as though it was from the clinic, when it was in fact, made by a third party, with the false claim it was from the doctors.
IIRC, there was some kind of threat involved as well.
But what do I know? I'm not one of the doctors!
Hospitals can't talked -- representatives for Hospitals can. Your article contains no named source.