Skip to comments.
Coast Guard Boarding Teams To Get More Powerful Pistols
The Day ^
| 12/10/2004
| ROBERT A. HAMILTON
Posted on 12/11/2004 6:12:01 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: Mr. Mojo
22
posted on
12/11/2004 6:43:18 AM PST
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: Mr. Mojo
The real big news is they are changing the ammunition to three different types and not just the caliber.
There's a line in the movie, 13th Warrior that I like which fits this article where they complain the 1911A1 is too heavy. The movie character complains a sword is too heavy and another tells him the solution is to get stronger.
Handguns are for close quarters combat. The adversary has to die in a matter of a single moment and not later. Hopefully, the new pistols and ammunition will have a better than 90 per cent One Shot Stop rating.
23
posted on
12/11/2004 6:44:18 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Frangible or soft rounds, made of ceramic or metal powder that are designed to break apart into dust when they hit something hard, to prevent ricochets during close-quarters combat. Also designed to transfer bullet energy to the 'soft' target with devastating and complete effeciency, causing massive hydrostatic shock in the wound area, while virtually eliminating through and through penetration of perpetrators and the possibility of wounding innocents, hostages, or fellow combatants on the other side of the perpetrator.
24
posted on
12/11/2004 6:44:21 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(I'm from North Dakota and I'm all FOR Global Warming!)
To: Armedanddangerous
I think there was a song written about that.
"Glock and Roll is here to stay"
25
posted on
12/11/2004 6:47:07 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(What if there were no hypothetical questions?)
To: Armedanddangerous
$4,200,000.00 divided by 12,000 = $350.00 each...quite a bargain!
To: ASA Vet
HOLY CRAP! That's one hell of a weapon! Great video!
27
posted on
12/11/2004 6:47:53 AM PST
by
Jackknife
(.......Land of the Free,because of the Brave.)
To: Tijeras_Slim
I wondered that too - guess I've just got some really aged hardware.
28
posted on
12/11/2004 6:48:02 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
To: Vision
I've shot a 3 inch .44 Smith. Load it with light .44 Specials. Try it first with full power .44 mag, before you buy it, if you want. Maybe you'll be able to shoot it. Big recoil, big flash, I'm told that you don't get as much velocity as you would with a longer barrel, but I can tell you that I wasn't able to get a quick follow up.
29
posted on
12/11/2004 6:48:57 AM PST
by
NYFriend
To: Thane_Banquo
"They should have switched back to a newer variant of the 1911 .45. Best damn handgun ever made."
Exactly my thought. But then, I'm still an M1 fan, too.
30
posted on
12/11/2004 6:51:23 AM PST
by
Spok
To: Mr. Mojo
My cousin in the Border Patrol has been using a Sig .40 for a couple of years . It's a fine weapon.
31
posted on
12/11/2004 6:52:08 AM PST
by
Tuba Guy
To: NonValueAdded
32
posted on
12/11/2004 6:52:17 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
To: Smokin' Joe
The first six rounds in each of my handguns is of the frangible type.
Expensive though, and I've not found a source to obtain just the bullet for loading my own.
33
posted on
12/11/2004 6:52:29 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(What if there were no hypothetical questions?)
To: Ramius
To: Mr. Mojo
$350 sounds like a good deal in government procurement.
35
posted on
12/11/2004 6:53:21 AM PST
by
opbuzz
(Right way, wrong way, Marine way)
To: Tijeras_Slim
I know a guy at the range who's happy with his. I prefer Smiths, but the Taurus is a good deal and strong.
I won't buy a smith after they became Clinton's lap dog in '99 and '00. F' them. After they broke, Clinton was empowered to threaten all the other companies. Never buy them new IMO.
36
posted on
12/11/2004 6:55:15 AM PST
by
Vision
("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
To: Spok
Exactly my thought. But then, I'm still an M1 fan, too.I'm not quit that old, but I do prefer the M-14 I used in Basic Training to the M-16.
The M-14 felt like a rifle.
37
posted on
12/11/2004 6:56:39 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(What if there were no hypothetical questions?)
To: Vision
I only have 2 Smiths that were produced after 1984. I concentrate on ones in the 1950-1970 era.
38
posted on
12/11/2004 6:57:00 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(I'm here because I'm not all there.)
To: ASA Vet
I'd use them if (and only if) I could afford to practice with them. Skills erode too quickly without range time, and I like to shoot what I shoot, now, and if need be, then.
39
posted on
12/11/2004 6:57:59 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(I'm from North Dakota and I'm all FOR Global Warming!)
To: ASA Vet
BTW, FReepmail me if you ever find a source for frangible round components, I reload, too. Thanks!
40
posted on
12/11/2004 6:59:23 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(I'm from North Dakota and I'm all FOR Global Warming!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson