Skip to comments.
Oliver North: Just scrap it and start over (Admit that the UN doesn't work, then get rid of it)
Town Hall ^
| December 10, 2004
| Colonel Oliver North
Posted on 12/10/2004 9:32:33 AM PST by Area Freeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Area Freeper
This President only became a "new world order zealot" when the terrorists forced his hand.No, he was a strong advocate for the FTAA from the beginning of his presidency. And the terrorist attacks should have induced any rational person to distance us from the UN, not embrace it.
21
posted on
12/10/2004 11:38:01 AM PST
by
inquest
(Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
To: Area Freeper
What direct order are you referring to?
22
posted on
12/10/2004 11:38:47 AM PST
by
inquest
(Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
To: Area Freeper
The UN has no authority to issue any order. Bush disobeyed nothing. The UN is a cancer that feeds off the American taxpayer and Bush will never reject them as such. He is another one worlder like the Rockefellers that brought us the UN.
23
posted on
12/10/2004 11:40:46 AM PST
by
cynicom
(<p)
To: Lunkhead_01
Does Russia qualify as a Democracy? What is the incentive for a country like Canada to join a US-dominated UN where they have no say? They have that already.
24
posted on
12/10/2004 11:41:43 AM PST
by
Area Freeper
(From John Kerry, they get a "yes/no/maybe" bowl of mush that can only encourage our enemies)
To: Area Freeper
Yes the Un is broken. BUT, most US citizens will think the UN is broken if it rules against our wishes. Sometimes when they take a position against ours, it may be that it's the correct position and ours in incorrect, or it's somewhere inbetween. What we really want is a global rubber stamp.
To: joesbucks
It's not "broken"; it's working as designed. That's the problem.
And I'm not looking for a global rubber stamp. We can stand on our own legitimacy.
26
posted on
12/10/2004 11:51:08 AM PST
by
inquest
(Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
To: inquest
There are many times the UN makes decisions (are they rulings) that are in deep conflict with US values, interests and positions. There have also been some times where it has been in our best interests for A to occur when in fact B may have been the better course for the globe. And, if you look to the UN as some sort or arbitor, someone in arbitration wins and someone loses. When we lose, we get p**sed and say the UN has no legitimacy.
that being said, I believe it is more often wrong that right with regard to the US, but sometimes we've got to walk a mile in the other mans shoes too.
To: Area Freeper; TMSuchman; NonValueAdded; Watery Tart; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; bluefish; ...
Thanks for the head's up... NonValueAdded! :)
Breaking out Ollie's ping list for a hearty
OLLIE PING!
28
posted on
12/10/2004 3:03:05 PM PST
by
cgk
(The Left was beaten by Pres Bush twice & will never have another shot at him... who's dumb?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson