Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faithincowboys
Actually, the troops did cheer the question.

I figured that was painfully clear to all.

I was wrong.

864 posted on 12/09/2004 5:10:59 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf

Regardless...

THE REPORTER WAS IN THE WRONG FOR TAKING ADVANTAGE OF A SOLDIER....IN THE WAY HE DID.

And you can tell that the media is aware that one of their own did something that he should not have...

Because they are already out trying to cover the reports a--.

Keith "I'm a punk a-- liberal and RATher deciple" Olbermann is already out defending Pitts to the death.

He reported that Pitts can't be reached...and that's why he can't comment on his actions.

WELL.....Pitts had no problem reaching people by internet yesterday!

Yes...the issue is serious....but the reporter should not rig the questions through a soldier.

And Pitts says it was the concern of the soldiers and he just worded it.....

But other reports are now showing that Pitts wrote the question with out the help of the soldier.

This was supposed to be a town hall for the soldiers...the reporter should have not interferred with the actual voice of the soldiers.

The reporter knows that the soldier may catch heat form friends when folks find out the question was a set up....but the reporter does not care about that soldiers well being....he just cars about bashing people.

The reporter should rot in hell.


881 posted on 12/09/2004 5:22:12 PM PST by ArmyBratproud (Ashcroft and Evans served us well....Can't Thank them enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson