Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

You are completely over the top.

I can't understand why you spend so little effort looking out to see if the troops might have legitimate needs and so much effort defending Rumsfeld.

It is too bad that you can't see what these guys have to work with. Yes, they make do, but is that the best that we have to offer them, make-do equipment?

FYI, when anyone published stats on how many HUMVEEs are not armored, remember that those that stay on base don't need armor. That reduces the number of those that actually need upgrades. So no, they don't all need it. But dang, you should see the difference it can make!

Maybe you should lean more towards looking out for the troops instead of looking out for the administration.


1,208 posted on 12/12/2004 6:47:14 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Some say the glass is half empty; some it's half full. I say, "Are you going to finish that?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1205 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye
Donald Rumsfeld is more than capable of defending himself without my assistance. No, what I object to are people with questionable patriotism who would rather provide aid and comfort to the MSM than support our effort in Iraq.

The steady drumbeat of resistance against the war in Iraq is heard not only from Al Jazeerah, but from America's MSM as well. If you want to defend the twerps in the MSM, that's your choice.

It'd be my guess that Kevin Sites is someone you admire.

1,209 posted on 12/12/2004 10:37:29 AM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson