Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper

I'll admit you probably spend a lot more time watching TV than I do. Heck, I don't even get much radio. So you've probably seen the replays over and over and over.

I haven't. About all I get is an infrequent brief radio news update and what I get off of FR.

So I'm not ignoring any facts. You have your opinions which are strongly colored with a pro-Rumsfeld bias and there's nothing wrong with that until you get to the denial stage you are in now.

The question was valid, was and is on the minds of a lot of troops, and seems to have surprised Rumsfeld. I don't think he expected it, there for making it "unexpected". Something that is unexpected is usually called a "surprise".

But you still seem more interested in Rumsfeld's defense than the troop's defense.

Are they getting the best America has or just enough to get by for now?

IMO, there are plenty of troops who really believe in the latter.

You might know that if you ate you meals with them.


1,140 posted on 12/10/2004 8:21:17 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Some say the glass is half empty; some it's half full. I say, "Are you going to finish that?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1139 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye

Stop mischaracterizing my statements and position on this matter.


1,143 posted on 12/10/2004 8:27:01 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson