Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dataman
I get a charge out of you Genesis critics. On one hand, you condemn the "literalists." On the other, you are incapable of recognizing figurative language when it bites you.

Actually, it's my observation that "day" in Genesis is figurative, not literal. I take great foundational truths from Genesis, I just don't see the point in laboring under an unnecessary fealty to one interpretation of "the" literal interpretation, that is, that "day" means a literal 24 hour time period in Genesis.


You can't have it both ways unless you reject the law of noncontradiction and the logic that goes with it.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. It seems to me that those who insist a literal day in Genesis 1 but concede a figurative day in Genesis 2 are the ones who want it both ways.


So which would you rather be, wrong or illogical?

Nonfallacious.

161 posted on 12/09/2004 2:25:02 PM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Fatalis

You're absolutely right. But it's a sound, well written argument against a belief I don't have and didn't mean to imply that I do have.


163 posted on 12/09/2004 2:27:35 PM PST by bigLusr (Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson