Last week someone on here told me I didnt know what I was talking about when I said an appeal would be filed if it was found out that Amber was negotiating a book deal during the trial.
Well Guess what--That is something Geragos is working on now.
Alred must have NOT known what her client was doing.
Being that the book will be published on Jan 4, 2005 either Amber Frey will write a whole book in record time or she had started writing during the trial which means that the book deal would have been negotiated during the trial.
Thursday morning on Fox and Friends 1st, Fox's Judge was talking about the exact point I made about an appeal.
Under California law, that is a NO NO. If the appeal is heard and approved. Then the next trial will have NO Amber and NO tapes that she recorded and was played in the first trial.
Maybe that was why Scott was laughing at the sentencing phrase.
On the other hand, some of the Jurors have came out and said his demeanor had alot with them convicting him. No emotion, but we all know that Defense Attorneys will tell their client to display no emotion as it can hurt the client either way. So when Scott showed no emotion during most of the trial, was it him or was it Geragos that told him not to?