Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
"Oh God."
"You have NOT paid attention to the evidence presented TO THE JURY. The dumping spot and the spots where she and her baby finally managed to wash ashore, is exactly where the experts had predicted and anticipated."

No I have NOT paid attention to the evidence presented TO THE JURY. (Why do you and Howlin have to YELL?)

Your own words say that "experts" predicted exactly where the body was dumped and where the bodies washed ashore.

I say that unless someone told these "experts" the exact coordinates of where the body was dumped - the "experts" could not possibly determine "exactly" where the bodies would wash ashore. In fact your very use of the word spots with respect to the two bodies proves that there is no exactitude in this prediction.

Of course, maybe Scott did offer evidence as to the exact location that he dumped the body...if this is so, I could theoretically be wrong.

Then again, with the use of 20-20 hindsight, I assume that a paid "expert" might be able to "predict" anything accurately...I personally predict that Dallas will win last night's football game for example...check it out on Yahoo sports...how did I do?

498 posted on 12/07/2004 1:24:15 PM PST by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]


To: Positive

Even you can't be as dense as you appear.
Tidal experts correctly charted the vicinity where
a body dumped at the location Scott said he fished,
would likely wash ashore... and she did. Both of them.


This is not rocket science, just science.


501 posted on 12/07/2004 1:28:45 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson