Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCLaw441
Nope, the death penalty should not be handed down in this case. Not because of the circumstances of the murder. But because of the evidence in the case.

If it is later found that he did not do it, that all the circumstantial evidence pointing in his direction was wrong, then society should have the opportunity to correct its mistake.

You have a guy in Texas that was just released after 17 years on death row for a crime even the judge in the case now says it is obvious he did not commit.

The death penalty is not something to be taken lightly, or as a matter of course as you seem to imply in your post.
387 posted on 12/07/2004 12:07:34 PM PST by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan

That case was about a fire and no apparent motive.
That guy was railroaded.
Snott has had a million dollar defense team.


389 posted on 12/07/2004 12:09:06 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan
If it is later found that he did not do it, that all the circumstantial evidence pointing in his direction was wrong,

What or where is the evidence -- ANY PIECE -- that points to anybody except Scott Peterson?

And I beg to differ about the DP; this was a premeditated crime in which he had to know that when he killed her he was killing his son.

Give him the needle.

397 posted on 12/07/2004 12:15:04 PM PST by Howlin (W, Still the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson