Most of them, including this one, are senseless; he could have just gotten a divorce -- but then that would have cost him money and everybody would think he wasn't perfect.
Charles Manson ring any bells.
For all I know, he's one of the children Jackie Peterson gave up for adoption, just like Searching4Justice said earlier.
Question; In the case I quoted above with all of that circumstantial evidence, where do you stand? Do you think he is still guilty after being exonerated? I mean with all of that circumstantial evidence such as lying to police, having his moms car, having hair strands, being at the scene of the murder, etc etc etc..How in the world was he exonerated if circumstantial evidence "ALWAYS" proves guilt. There was lots of circumstantial evidence in this guys case, why was he exonerated?
LOL well atleast we know they went to different schools together !