Yep, if there were many little bits of evidence, you WOULD be convicted, because you did kill her. Fishing on Christmas Eve in the same spot her body was dumped, not knowing what you were fishing for, lying to the police, hawking her jewelry, selling her house, calling your girlfriend during wife's wake, injuries on your hands that look like scratch marks, lying to the police repeatedly, being caught with your appearance changed, gobs of cash and a ticket for Mexico, lying more to the authorities, not reacting when the bodies were found and on and on and on.
Scott wasn't convicted on 5 or 10 or even 15 bits of evidence, but much more. It is the sum of all the parts that points to only one missing piece of the puzzle...Scott.
I have said all along that he is Guilty, but I still stand by the fact that all of the evidence was NOT heard. If it was your kid you would want ALL evidence to be heard. Not just the evidence that makes him look guilty.