Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: An Englishman's Home Is His Dungeon
The Telegraph ^ | December 7, 2004 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 12/06/2004 4:43:23 PM PST by quidnunc

One of the key measures of a society's health is how easily you can insulate yourself from its underclass. In America, unless one resides in a very small number of problematic inner-city quarters or wishes to make a career in the drug trade, one will live a life blessedly untouched by crime. In Britain, alas, it's the peculiar genius of Home Office policy to have turned the entire country into one big, rundown, inner-city, no-go slum estate, extending from prosperous suburbs to leafy villages, even unto Upper Cheyne Row.

The murderers of John Monckton understood the logic of this policy better than the lethargic overpaid British constabulary. An Englishman's home is not his castle, but his dungeon and ever more so — window bars, window locks, dead bolts, laser security, and no doubt biometricrecognition garage doors, once the Blunkett national ID card goes into circulation.

All this high-tech protection, urged on the householder by Pc Plod, may make your home more secure, but it makes you less so. From the burglar's point of view, the more advanced and impregnable the alarm systems become, the more it makes sense just to knock on the door and stab whoever answers.

Mr Monckton's killers thus made an entirely rational choice. He was a wealthy man, living in a prestigious neighbourhood of £3 million homes, and he presumably had the best security system to go with it. But time it right, get him to the front door, and the state-enforced impotence of the homeowner makes him as vulnerable as any old loser in a decrepit urine-sodden block on Broadwater Farm.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: banglist; crime; criminals; england; greatbritain; homeinvasion; marksteyn; steyn; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2004 4:43:24 PM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

He's ba-aack!


2 posted on 12/06/2004 4:46:41 PM PST by Pete98 (After his defeat by the Son of God, Satan changed his name to Allah and started over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Sounds a lot like Toronto.


3 posted on 12/06/2004 4:46:45 PM PST by KateatRFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Bump for rational thinking.


4 posted on 12/06/2004 4:49:13 PM PST by ez (Let the tolerant tolerate my intolerance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
It's the British Isles, if they allow it to go to hell that's their choice.

Of course, in the U.S. we're turning into a bilingual nation because of all the illegal Mexicans who don't exactly have to swim the English Channel to get here, but that's beside the point.

5 posted on 12/06/2004 4:50:02 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KateatRFM

An Englishman's home is his dungeon
By Mark Steyn
(Filed: 07/12/2004)

One of the key measures of a society's health is how easily you can insulate yourself from its underclass. In America, unless one resides in a very small number of problematic inner-city quarters or wishes to make a career in the drug trade, one will live a life blessedly untouched by crime. In Britain, alas, it's the peculiar genius of Home Office policy to have turned the entire country into one big, rundown, inner-city, no-go slum estate, extending from prosperous suburbs to leafy villages, even unto Upper Cheyne Row.

The murderers of John Monckton understood the logic of this policy better than the lethargic overpaid British constabulary. An Englishman's home is not his castle, but his dungeon and ever more so - window bars, window locks, dead bolts, laser security, and no doubt biometricrecognition garage doors, once the Blunkett national ID card goes into circulation.

All this high-tech protection, urged on the householder by Pc Plod, may make your home more secure, but it makes you less so. From the burglar's point of view, the more advanced and impregnable the alarm systems become, the more it makes sense just to knock on the door and stab whoever answers.

Mr Monckton's killers thus made an entirely rational choice. He was a wealthy man, living in a prestigious neighbourhood of £3 million homes, and he presumably had the best security system to go with it. But time it right, get him to the front door, and the state-enforced impotence of the homeowner makes him as vulnerable as any old loser in a decrepit urine-sodden block on Broadwater Farm.

Various reassuring types, from police spokesmen to the Economist, described the stabbing of the Moncktons as a "burglary gone wrong". If only more burglaries could go right, they imply, this sort of thing wouldn't happen.

But the trouble is that this kind of burglary - the kind most likely to go "wrong" - is now the norm in Britain. In America, it's called a "hot" burglary - a burglary that takes place when the homeowners are present - or a "home invasion", which is a much more accurate term. Just over 10 per cent of US burglaries are "hot" burglaries, and in my part of the world it's statistically insignificant: there is virtually zero chance of a New Hampshire home being broken into while the family are present. But in England and Wales it's more than 50 per cent and climbing. Which is hardly surprising given the police's petty, well-publicised pursuit of those citizens who have the impertinence to resist criminals.

These days, even as he or she is being clobbered, the more thoughtful British subject is usually keeping an eye (the one that hasn't been poked out) on potential liability. Four years ago, Shirley Best, proprietor of the Rolander Fashion emporium, whose clients include Zara Phillips, was ironing some clothes when the proverbial two youths showed up. They pressed the hot iron into her flesh, burning her badly, and then stole her watch. "I was frightened to defend myself," said Miss Best. "I thought if I did anything I would be arrested." There speaks the modern British crime victim.

Her Majesty's Constabulary has metaphorically put a huge neon sign on every suburban cul-de-sac advertising open season on property owners. If you have a crime policy that makes "hot" burglaries routine, it's a reasonable bet that more and more citizens will wind up beaten, stabbed or dead.

I've been writing on this subject in The Telegraph for the best part of a decade now and, to be honest, I might as well recycle the 1996 or 1997 column and spend the week in the Virgin Islands.

My argument never changes. All that changes is the increasing familiarity of Britons with violent crime. Mr Monckton was a cousin by marriage of The Sunday Telegraph's Dominic Lawson, who is leading a campaign to allow citizens to defend themselves in their own homes.

That this most basic right should be something for which he has to organise a campaign is disgraceful. In New Hampshire, there are few burglaries because there's a high rate of gun ownership. Getting your head blown off for a $70 TV set isn't worth it. Conversely, thanks to the British police, burning the flesh of a London dressmaker to get her watch is definitely worth it. In Chelsea the morning after Mr Monckton's murder, Her Majesty's Keystone Konstabulary with all their state-of-the-art toys had sealed off the street in an almost comical illustration of their lavishly funded uselessness.

But let's look at it from their point of view. Suppose, instead of more of these robberies going wrong, they went right. The homeowner cowered in the bathroom, while the lads helped themselves to the DVD player and the wife's jewellery, and then the coppers came round and took a statement and advised you to get another half-dozen door chains and keep the jewellery in a vault at the bank.

Is it reasonable to live like that? After some crime column or other last year, I had a flurry of letters from American readers who'd been working in Britain and had been astonished at the rate of "garden theft" - that's to say, stuff the average American would never dream of lugging indoors back home, but which, during his sojourn across the pond, had been half-inched from the patio in the course of the night.

The British establishment's current complacent approach accepts that ever greater and ever more violent crime is a fact of life, rather than a historical aberration encouraged by the unprecedented constraints placed on the law-abiding and the boundless licence extended to the criminal class. That policy leads remorselessly to more deaths, and to lives lived under small but ever more insidious and corrupting restrictions.

The Tories' big mistake was their failure to understand that "freedom" isn't just about consumer choices or buying your council flat. It's also about being free to defend your home - after all, you're there on the scene and the West Midlands Police 24-Hour Crime Hotline answering machine isn't.

And an assertive citizenry, confident in its freedoms and its responsibilities, is a better bet for long-term survival than the passive charges of the nanny state. If the Government declines to pay any heed to The Sunday Telegraph campaign, and if the police persist in victimising the victims of crime, then I hope we'll see widespread jury rebellion and a refusal to convict.

The right to protect your family does not derive from any home secretary or chief constable.

6 posted on 12/06/2004 4:50:12 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

BTTT


7 posted on 12/06/2004 4:50:48 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
For later.

L

8 posted on 12/06/2004 4:51:36 PM PST by Lurker (Beware of the man who only has one gun. He most likely knows how to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
And an assertive citizenry, confident in its freedoms and its responsibilities, is a better bet for long-term survival than the passive charges of the nanny state.

I wonder if the British understand this?

9 posted on 12/06/2004 4:52:25 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"... illegal Mexicans who don't exactly have to swim the English Channel to get here...."

Now there's an idea.

The legendary Southwest Passage.

Just blast a ~2 mile wide, sea level channel from Brownsville to San Diego. No need to worry about Panama anymore either.

10 posted on 12/06/2004 5:03:46 PM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Forgiven_Sinner; Constitution Day; Pokey78; Eurotwit; free me; Tolik; ...
Thanks for the q-flu shot DG

Steyn pong.

FMCDH(BITS)

11 posted on 12/06/2004 5:06:50 PM PST by nothingnew (Kerry is gone...perhaps to Lake Woebegone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randog
"And an assertive citizenry, confident in its freedoms and its responsibilities, is a better bet for long-term survival than the passive charges of the nanny state."

Obviously the essense of this tilt against the windmill. The Brits might as well just give up and implore Chirac to rule them as a colony of France.

12 posted on 12/06/2004 5:09:34 PM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
The right to protect your family does not derive from any home secretary or chief constable.

The poor Brits need a revolution to free them from the yoke of tyranny.

13 posted on 12/06/2004 5:18:55 PM PST by Podkayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
And an assertive citizenry, confident in its freedoms and its responsibilities, is a better bet for long-term survival than the passive charges of the nanny state. If the Government declines to pay any heed to The Sunday Telegraph campaign, and if the police persist in victimising the victims of crime, then I hope we'll see widespread jury rebellion and a refusal to convict. The right to protect your family does not derive from any home secretary or chief constable.

BTTT

14 posted on 12/06/2004 5:19:13 PM PST by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones

"Of course, in the U.S. we're turning into a bilingual nation because of all the illegal Mexicans..."

Well, yes, but we still have the right to self-defense!

I am horrified at these stories coming out of England.

And the most horrifying thing: the Tories can't get anywhere. They truly must be a party of John Kerrys if they can't get any traction with some of the dreadful stuff going on.

What do I know, for all I know the Tories may be the instagators of this cr*p.


15 posted on 12/06/2004 5:24:27 PM PST by jocon307 (Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xJones
It's the British Isles, if they allow it to go to hell that's their choice.

What with the Anglo-Saxon population of Britain on the decline and the Muslim population on the rapid increase, perhaps this policy of transforming Britain into Hell-on-Earth is deliberate policy to make the inheritors of what is left after all the Anglos leave feel right at home.

16 posted on 12/06/2004 5:25:05 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Excellent article, thank you for posting. :-)

Just curious, does Free Republic's mandatory excerpt policy apply to articles published in the Telegraph now as well?


17 posted on 12/06/2004 5:30:32 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
They truly must be a party of John Kerrys

Aristocracy Sucks.

18 posted on 12/06/2004 5:32:51 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Excellent article, thank you for posting. :-)

Just curious, does Free Republic's mandatory excerpt policy apply to articles published in the Telegraph now as well?

No, it does not. As a matter of principle, quidnunc excerpts all articles he posts. He believes that Copyright Law should apply even when it is not enforced.

19 posted on 12/06/2004 5:54:48 PM PST by derlauerer (To expect the government to save you is to be a bystander in your own fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew

Thanks for the ping. Great column.


20 posted on 12/06/2004 5:59:10 PM PST by Defiant (Democrats: Don't go away mad, just go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson