Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fatalis

Obviously, it is a generalization. Your generalization encompasses a much greater slice of the female population than college girls and Oprah listeners. Hence, your use of the "on the whole". That means the majority, doesn't it?

As to your "name me a time when women were more ungrateful than today", that's just silly. I don't think they ask that question during census taking so there aren't any stats to prove or disprove the point.

You feel that woman are more ungrateful now than ever before. Fine. You are entitled to your opinion, just as I am entitle to mine, which is, you hang around with the wrong women.


241 posted on 12/06/2004 10:58:08 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
Obviously, it is a generalization. Your generalization encompasses a much greater slice of the female population than college girls and Oprah listeners. Hence, your use of the "on the whole". That means the majority, doesn't it?

No, "on the whole," or "taken as a whole," don't have to mean a majority, the phrases refer to a generalization about the whole group, and generalizations can be moved by a minority.


As to your "name me a time when women were more ungrateful than today", that's just silly.

No, because the current population of American men are, on the whole, more attentive to a greater variety of women's needs than men in any other country, at any other time, yet the current population of American women, on the whole, have higher expectations than any other group of women.

303 posted on 12/06/2004 11:19:33 AM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson