Seems that it was a kangaroo court, no ME made a finding of murder, there were no witnesses, no crime scene, no cause of death, no weapons.
I have read it, actually. Thanks! What there was against Scott Peterson, esentially, is a whole lot of circumstantial evidence.
The thing is, circumstantial evidence is evidence just the same, and completely legit.
I didn't hear all the evidence, so I can't speak on the merits. I will say, however, that you don't need any of those things to convict a person of murder.
Kooky? Maybe. But it's the law.