Alamo-Girl this is a response to your post #267. I think I must refer to
my response on the other thread since I see I need to respond to betty's post below.
But I must state something here, that I have said in the response I linked above and which I'm likely to repeat. I do not think it will be useful to engage in a debate that attempts to engage complexity as the only acceptable result of attempts to point out problems with other theories. All scientific theories have problems, that is why we have scientists. I want to argue against something tangible or, to put it another way, I am not prepared to enter into a discussion in which I must do nothing but defend current scientific theories while not having the opportunity to question competing theories that are clearly stated. I think that would be unfair.