[PatrickHenry]

In post 258 I hastily wrote:
"Visit one of the evolution threads and dispassionately observe the conduct of those whose erroneous worldview is needlessly collapsing around them."

What I was trying to say is this:
"Visit one of the evolution threads and dispassionately observe the conduct of those whose erroneous worldview is needlessly collapsing around them because it erroneously depends on miracles in everyday biology."

Without the proof-reading marks, it's this:
"Visit one of the evolution threads and dispassionately observe the conduct of those whose worldview is needlessly collapsing around them because it erroneously depends on miracles in everyday biology."

[StJacques]

I think you make a very good point on the errors of tying one's religious views or any aspect of one's religious faith to science. There never will be any scientific proof in my opinion.

Morality, Ethics, the quintessential problem of Good and Evil (that last one is really big in my opinion); these are the places to look for developing a substantial argument that there must be a God.

And I have no doubt there is a God. I just never look to science to give me any kind of proof for my belief.