[Truth wins]

I read a critique of the Atlantic "war game" article. This critique -- and I'm sorry to say I can't remember where I read it or who wrote it -- suggested a naval blockade of oil shipments as an alternative not considered in the Atlantic article. The idea was that the resulting economic disturbances within Iran might cause the "mullacracy" to topple. Of course, a blockade would result in oil market disturbances with economic consequences, not to mention diplomatic problems with the Europeans (as if. . .). But the results of a war would dwarf these consequences.

It sure would be nice to get shed of our dependence on ME oil, for all kinds of reasons.

[quant5]

"Of course, a blockade would result in oil market disturbances with economic consequences, not to mention diplomatic problems with the Europeans (as if. . .)"

This is actually the best possible option in my opinion. The more Iraqi crude now flowing out of the gulf the less we need Iran's oil.