Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping. I just read the small excerpt of the article so I don't know if it's any good. BUT - down the thread there are excellent links and a good discussion. Many points made. Especially a list of links about FORMER homosexuals.

If there are former homosexuals, that is proof right there that homosexuality is not genetic.

There are no former black people, former Chinese people, former caucasians, former men or women*, or fomer humans.

*Even transsexuals still have the DNA for the person they were born. A man who "transforms" himself into a so-called woman is not a woman. He is a man who has committed bodily torture in order to masquerade as a woman. That's all. It's a mental illness.

Let me and ItsOurTimeNow if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


77 posted on 11/28/2004 1:44:00 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
There are no former black people...

That's not what the NAACP says about Justice Clarence Thomas. ;-)

78 posted on 11/28/2004 1:54:12 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
If there are former homosexuals, that is proof right there that homosexuality is not genetic.

Tens of thousands of former homosexuals agree with you.

Here's something of value, IMO:

Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different. If we were to assume momentarily that homosexuality was genetic, then the most one could conclude is that those individuals were not morally responsible for being homosexual. However, that does not mean that they are not morally responsible for homosexual actions! Merely having the gene would not force one to carry out the behavior. For instance, if scientists were able to document that a “rape gene” existed, we certainly would not blame an individual for possessing this gene, but neither would we allow him to act upon that rape disposition. Source
The same could be said for pedophiles and other perversions. Yet we have tens of thousands of former homosexuals, which tells us homosexuals can change.

If consenting adults want to engage in a behavior that results in severe health hazards, we should warn them whenever possible. We certainly shouldn't be encouraging homosexuality in the schools, nor celebrating it in any fashion whatsoever.

85 posted on 11/28/2004 3:48:07 PM PST by scripter (Tens of thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson