Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix; Haro_546
I think we got away from the original concept of the thread. Haro 546 was saying that he thought the F-22 was a bad investment.

In desicions such as this, i put a lot of faith in the opinions of the pilots who fly the state-of-the-art machines. It would appear that they think the F-22 is a worthy part of our defense system.

With the multitude of systems at hand, the F-22 is, IMHO, a step in the right direction, and a valuable addition to our arsenal.

335 posted on 11/25/2004 9:15:22 PM PST by airborne (God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: airborne
The F-22 is a great aircraft. This and future platforms have to be developed to stay ahead of the newest versions of the SU-37 with vectored thrust and its successors.
342 posted on 11/25/2004 9:21:07 PM PST by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

To: airborne
With the multitude of systems at hand, the F-22 is, IMHO, a step in the right direction, and a valuable addition to our arsenal.

Where I work, we machine many titanium parts for the F-22. Tolerances on the F-22 are tighter than the F-15 and F-18, too. This all adds to the cost besides all the data we now have save on the major fittings. I think the F-22 will be worth the cost. It will show the Chinese, Russians, French, or Indians that we mean business.

My Dad, who was a long time McDonell-Douglas manager and WW2 veteran would say "Those who control the skys will win the battle". Then he would add "Son, you don't want to be on the losing side in a war". A firm believer in peace through strength.

356 posted on 11/25/2004 9:30:04 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson