To: airborne
It was an opinion. I based it in a belief that air dominance can be more cost effective. The point of having a discussion is to arrive to the truth, but many people are being unhelpful.
192 posted on
11/25/2004 7:58:29 PM PST by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Haro_546
It was an opinion. I based it in a belief that air dominance can be more cost effective.Please post your source of information that was used in forming your belief and/or opinion.
211 posted on
11/25/2004 8:05:46 PM PST by
airborne
(God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
To: Haro_546
The point of having a discussion is to arrive to the truth, but many people are being unhelpful. We have arrived at a truth. America will continue with it's aircraft development, and China will have to spend Billions to catch up. And probably still fall behind.
And still have the psycho in North Korea with nukes to worry about.
I'm glad he's not in my back yard...
/john
214 posted on
11/25/2004 8:08:15 PM PST by
JRandomFreeper
(D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson