Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airborne
It was an opinion. I based it in a belief that air dominance can be more cost effective. The point of having a discussion is to arrive to the truth, but many people are being unhelpful.
192 posted on 11/25/2004 7:58:29 PM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: Haro_546
It was an opinion. I based it in a belief that air dominance can be more cost effective.

Please post your source of information that was used in forming your belief and/or opinion.

211 posted on 11/25/2004 8:05:46 PM PST by airborne (God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: Haro_546
The point of having a discussion is to arrive to the truth, but many people are being unhelpful.

We have arrived at a truth. America will continue with it's aircraft development, and China will have to spend Billions to catch up. And probably still fall behind.

And still have the psycho in North Korea with nukes to worry about.

I'm glad he's not in my back yard...

/john

214 posted on 11/25/2004 8:08:15 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson