[John Valentine]

Sad to say, I approve of the defense of property rights, even if it is the Salvation Army, a worthwhile organization if ever was one, that has to stand aside.

This is especially true if it is so that Target would be open territory to ANYONE at all if the Salvation Army is permitted to stay.

Sorry, but this won't keep me away from Target if they have something I want.

[Mr. Lucky]

Your post implies a federal court ruling that permitting the Salvation Army to solicit donations at Christmastime requires the property owner to then permit all sorts of other groups.

I am unable to find any post (or Lexis-Nexis reference) which actually identifies such a court decision.

Is there really such a case?