Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steam secret of natural fission
e4engineering.com ^ | 11/22/04 | Stuart Nathan

Posted on 11/23/2004 4:11:14 PM PST by LibWhacker

The world's only known natural nuclear reactor, which decommissioned itself over two billion years ago, could provide insights into how modern nuclear plants can operate more safely.

The site, in Gabon, West Africa, ran for 150million years without blowing up, and storing its own waste in a safe manner.

The reactor was a natural deposit of uranium. Today, and for the last two billion years, natural uranium will not undergo nuclear reactions, because it contains too little of the fissionable isotope, uranium-235 (U235).

But in the distant past, U235 was more abundant, comprising 3% of the total amount - the approximate concentration of enriched uranium used in nuclear fuel today. The Gabon deposit also contained, by a quirk of geology, a mixture of minerals which acted as a neutron moderator, slowing the neutron flux enough to allow the fission process to take place.

In a nuclear reactor, it takes large numbers of specialists and serious application of high technology to prevent reactions from running away. 'The big question we addressed was: when the uranium reached criticality, why didn't it blow up?' says Alexander Meschik of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri.

The answer, it appears, is that the site functioned like a geyser.

The energy generated by the nuclear reaction boiled the groundwater around the deposit. Water is a natural neutron moderator, so as it was converted into steam, it stopped absorbing neutrons and shut down the chain reaction. As the rocks cooled down, the steam condensed, and the presence of water once again slowed the neutrons down and restarted the chain reaction. Meschik calculates that the reactor operated for about half an hour at a time, then shut down for two and a half hours.

Meschik deduced this by analysing the other neutron moderator in the deposit, a 'mineral assembly' containing lanthanum, cerium, strontium and calcium and known as alumophosphate. This also acted as a waste storage medium, the researchers found; it absorbed the isotopes of xenon which were formed by the fission of the U235.

Xenon is extremely rare on Earth and is a characteristic marker of a fission process. It occurs in nine isotopes, and it was the analysis of the relative abundances of these which gave the researchers the clue to the way the reactor operated.

The find could provide insight into how to operate industrial reactors more safely. 'This is very impressive, to think that this natural system not only went critical, it also safely stored the waste,' Meschik says. 'Just using the fact that the water boiled at the reactor site might give contemporary nuclear reactor researchers ideas on how to operate more safely and efficiently.'


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; fission; gabon; jmarvinherndon; natural; nuclear; steam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2004 4:11:15 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Very interesting post. Thank you.


2 posted on 11/23/2004 4:13:48 PM PST by fuzzthatwuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

And you can, of course, extract energy from steam as well. Interesting story. Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 11/23/2004 4:17:36 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The energy generated by the nuclear reaction boiled the groundwater around the deposit. Water is a natural neutron moderator, so as it was converted into steam, it stopped absorbing neutrons and shut down the chain reaction. As the rocks cooled down, the steam condensed, and the presence of water once again slowed the neutrons down and restarted the chain reaction. Meschik calculates that the reactor operated for about half an hour at a time, then shut down for two and a half hours.

Does this sound backwards to you as it does to me?

If it stopped absorbing Neutrons as water was deminished that would SPEED UP the reaction.

4 posted on 11/23/2004 4:22:02 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
In a nuclear reactor, it takes large numbers of specialists and serious application of high technology to prevent reactions from running away. 'The big question we addressed was: when the uranium reached criticality, why didn't it blow up?' says Alexander Meschik of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri.

In water moderated reactors, like this one. Water temperature has an inverse coefficient of reactivity.

at least that is how it was explained to me in school. Which is why nuke boats run a little better with cold primary coolant.

5 posted on 11/23/2004 4:23:44 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Now how far away from the area in Africa where some scientists claim human life evolved was this massive source of radiation and what was that Darwin said about evolutionary mutations?
6 posted on 11/23/2004 4:27:26 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzthatwuz
Very interesting post. Thank you.

Nothing that wasn't studied in beginning Nuclear Engineering classes decades ago.

7 posted on 11/23/2004 4:29:38 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Yep, sounds backward to me, too. And I can't pretend to understand it. Thought it was fascinating, though, that there was a natural fission reactor on Earth that ran safely, unattended for 150 million years!


8 posted on 11/23/2004 4:30:14 PM PST by LibWhacker (FOUR MORE YEARS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Does this sound backwards to you as it does to me? If it stopped absorbing Neutrons as water was deminished that would SPEED UP the reaction.

You are absolutely correct. More later.

9 posted on 11/23/2004 4:30:55 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

What a bunch of crap! I safely stored the waste products for 2 BILLION years! Guess that was enough time for them to decay to NOTHING! We in the nucular (spelling intentional) have alway said that the Romans had nuclear power because they solidified their waste (mostly Co-60) in concrete drums (like we do today), then the drums rusted away. Now we call them columns. (and yes, I'm kidding)


10 posted on 11/23/2004 4:34:44 PM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Neutrons need to be slowed for fission. Sounds counterintuitive but thems the breaks.

As for "and storing its own waste in a safe manner.", others I've read (ages ago) have hypothesized the site as one of the main drivers of the initial diversification of life through the halo of higher than normal radiation induced mutation around the structure...

11 posted on 11/23/2004 4:36:22 PM PST by Axenolith (Pizza... Accept no substitute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Depends on the type of reactor the dynamics of the natural core. Funny thing is, natural cores act have a tendency to act the opposite of what was just described, i.e, + void coefficient of reactivity. Some have the opposite effect.


12 posted on 11/23/2004 4:37:19 PM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

The thing seems to have stopped seriously radiating waaaayy before humans evolved.


13 posted on 11/23/2004 4:39:36 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: konaice

I'm not sure, but if the water absorbs an atoms neutrons, it destabilizes the atomic weight of the atom losing the neutron and that then creates the reaction with another atom. That's why as it steams out, the reaction settles don.


14 posted on 11/23/2004 4:39:48 PM PST by WileyPost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WileyPost

DOH! Burned by spellcheck!


15 posted on 11/23/2004 4:41:10 PM PST by WileyPost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

How do we know it ran safely? Like, who was monitoring it? No animals died from its radiation? No fish suffered cancer?

This is (pun intended) a very old story, but to use it as evidence of anything is kind of silly.


16 posted on 11/23/2004 4:41:19 PM PST by donmeaker (Why did the Romans cross the road? To keep the slaves from revolting again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Wow!! The Creator is amazing. Theres nothing new under the sun. Everything man does God has already done.


17 posted on 11/23/2004 4:43:39 PM PST by winodog (We need to water the liberty tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting article, however, not new information. This mode of operation, to my knowledge, has been assumed since the discovery of the site.

With regard to commercial applications, the measure of the effect of water density on criticality is called Alpha T. A negative Alpha T implies that a decrease in water density promotes shutdown (as described here). A positive Alpha T implies the opposite. All US and Western commercial reactors have always, by law, been required to have a negative Alpha T. The Soviet RBMK reactor (think Chernobyl) OTOH had a positive Alpha T.

The principle described therefore has always been a bedrock of Western commercial reactor design.


18 posted on 11/23/2004 4:44:01 PM PST by brutuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winodog

Nuclear waste is radioactive in terms of being very harmful to human health for 100,000 years. It doesn't return to the background radiation that natural uranium has for upwards of 1,000,000 years.

If we dispose of it in Yucca mountain for example, who will be able to read the operations manual in 100,000?


19 posted on 11/23/2004 4:46:34 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: brutuss
All US and Western commercial reactors have always, by law, been required to have a negative Alpha T.At full power operation and after some licensed burnup. Most operate with a positive Alpha-T for some time of operation after each refueling.
20 posted on 11/23/2004 4:48:30 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson