What I'm trying to point out and what is obviously beyond you, is that Lenin was a Manchurian candidate, bought by the Kaiser. Soros equally buys candidates and then rapes the lands he's bought.
Your analogy regarding Lenin as a Manchurian candidate is inaccurate. It is true Germany sent Lenin to Russia. However, once there he was an independent actor and out of Germany's control. Are you suggesting that Lenin continued to do the Kaiser's bidding once he was in Russia?
Also, if Soros supports Yushchenko, and Bush supports Yushchenko, does that mean that Soros supports Bush? If so, does that mean we all should support Putin? BTW, these are rhetorical questions.
Lenin and the Kaiser used each other because they each had something to gain. Lenin was not a "Manchurian candidate".
Does the phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" ring a bell? Just because the boogey man Soros is involved doesn't mean he can't be used to advance another goal.
If using Soros helps advance Ukrainian development, then I say use him. Maybe he'll get more then he bargained for, just like the Kaiser did.