You are such a twit. You just got finished arguing that scale of deployment has nothing to do with vulnerability rates:
"Apache is much more popular, yet IIS is more attacked."
Now, you're arguing that it isn't fair to compare IIS 6.0 with Apache 2.0 because the deployment scales aren't equivalent:
"Uh, no. For an apples to apples comparison, you compare the Microsoft web server being most used to the Apache web server thats being most used."
---Actually, his first point is about product-wide scale of deployment, his second point is about version-based scale of deployment.
Doesn't eliminate his circular argument.