To: TexasGreg
yes, I'm talking about Bush challenging the no-third-term Amendment.Bush would get stomped in the election.
Two terms is enough. No one, not FDR, not Ronald Reagan, not GWB, is indispensable.
90 posted on
11/22/2004 8:12:36 AM PST by
sinkspur
("It is a great day to be alive. I appreciate your gratitude." God Himself.)
To: sinkspur
No one, not FDR, not Ronald Reagan, not GWB, is indispensable.
Oh, I agree. The issue is not indispensability ... it's the advisability of a two-term rule. Two terms, in principle, are a nice idea, and naturally held until FDR. FDR had special circumstances in 1944.
104 posted on
11/22/2004 8:38:31 AM PST by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson