Her critics would have destroyed her if she were a man. We live in a world where we protect our women (even loud, gun toting women that don't need it.)
I enjoy listening to her but she is late to the party of radio hosts. I have not heard anything from her that I haven't heard many times before from Sean, Rush, and even Boortz. In that regard, she's just a cheerleader like Sean.
Maybe your insight is different than mine but I haven't heard anything new. And she gets a lot of things wrong since her conviction is not as deep. She is in the process of converting but on many things she is just wrong. Deep analysis would have already found her mistakes.
No one (on the radio) out analyzes Rush and by that I mean the team that makes Rush work. Much of his humor is sophmoric because that is what the audience wants but when he goes deep, it is a pure delight.
I would rather hear Horowitz if I want to hear someone who is in the process of converting.
When I catch her on radio, it is refreshing because despite her sometimes clumbsy presentation, she responds more interactively with the callers and I like that when they are interseting.
I cannot tell you how often I have heard a Rush caller raise a line of approach that appears promising and pertinent, only to have Rush shut hom off and only use the caller for his programatic plan..This is not a big objection to Rush, I really like listening to him when I am in the car during the day. I agree that Rush has invaluable analysis and perspectives and that Horowitz is a truly deeper thinker than anyone else.
I just like Tammy too--more nativley intelligent than Rush but of course Rush has many other important qualities.
Have you read her book?
I doubt it!
If you had, your attitude and opinion would be different.
The problem with a lot opinions is that they are based upon prejudice and ignorance.