[FairOpinion]

B-- your basic premise is that there was never any cause for concern. Well, here is an excerpt from the WT article, (post 933) which highlights that the Chilean security did not act in good faith -- and that's an understatement.

"Chilean security knew that the Secret Service always accompanies the president and knows how to identify them by the pins on their lapels, the source said, but blocked them anyway. "

[Barlowmaker]

What do you take from the "sources" comment in the WTimes that he "saw it coming?" If the Chileans were adamant that they were providing the security, and the SS breached their prerogative - should we be happy, mad, sad, pi$$ed at the Chileans or pi$$ed at the Secret Service for anticipating this altercation and not informing the President of the threat?