Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberty for All (review of "The Case for Democracy" that Bush is reading - agenda for Middle East)
Commentary Magazine ^ | November 2004 | Arch Puddington

Posted on 11/20/2004 11:21:23 AM PST by baseball_fan

Natan Sharansky surely numbers among the foremost champions of freedom of recent times. A leading voice of Soviet dissent during the 1970’s, he was largely responsible for transforming the demand that Soviet Jews be allowed to emigrate to Israel into the most influential protest movement in Soviet history. As a prisoner in the gulag, charged by the Kremlin with treason, Sharansky became a leading symbol of resistance to totalitarian brutality.

...Sharansky’s case for what amounts to a refashioning of the Middle East’s political culture

...The need for stability, Sharansky concluded, is one of the most misused arguments in political life. “In its name,” he writes, “autocrats are embraced, dictators are coddled, and tyrants are courted.”

...he advocates the creation of an entirely new institution, consisting exclusively of democratic states, as an alternative to the tyrant-infested United Nations.

(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; casefordemocracy; sharansky
Natan Sharansky and George Bush are not ones to be underestimated. This might be the equivalent of winning the Cold War - only in the Middle East. Are we being too idealistic or does this make sense when the old realism no longer works?
1 posted on 11/20/2004 11:21:24 AM PST by baseball_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: baseball_fan

The realism of the past - the embracing of dictators and totalitarian regimes in the belief that it promoted our strategic interests aka "stability" - gave us 9/11.


2 posted on 11/20/2004 11:47:47 AM PST by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baseball_fan

Maybe Bush could talk to his buddies in the Saudi royal family about bringing "democracy" to that country...


3 posted on 11/20/2004 9:04:39 PM PST by John R. (Bob) Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John R. (Bob) Locke

You're kidding right? At this moment, it would be suicide for the West.


4 posted on 11/23/2004 8:28:31 AM PST by newzjunkey ("The rule of law has become confused with - indeed subverted by - the rule of judges." - Robert Bork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Just pointing out that there are plenty of opportunities in the Middle East for "democracy".

But I'm not going to hold my breath and wait for this administration (or any other, for that matter) to press the Saudi's to move in that direction.

5 posted on 11/24/2004 8:03:49 PM PST by John R. (Bob) Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson