[Joe Hadenuf]

You want sugar coated niceties for a power drunk judge that gets tough with children? Find yourself tinkerbell. You wont get them from me.

Our government and their agents, ie: Judges, LEOs, the President, stand winking and nodding, and actually aiding and abetting the epic lawlessness of millions entering our country illegally, and then force all of us to pay for this titanic crime, by confiscating our incomes. I have much contempt for them and their *GLARING* hypocrisy and fraud. You want to kiss the a$$ of this kind of hyporcrisy? Be my guest, just don't expect me to fall in lock step cadence behind you.

[beezdotcom]

for a power drunk judge that gets tough with children?

If you actually go and specifically research THIS judge, you'll find that you can't back this assertion up. Of course, if you scratch no deeper than the headlines, you'll continue to believe this assertion, and probably the ones that also say we're cruel to deny services to illegal aliens (see, I can bring in irrelevant topics also).

Our government and their agents, ie: Judges, LEOs, the President, stand winking and nodding, and actually aiding and abetting the epic lawlessness of millions entering our country illegally, and then force all of us to pay for this titanic crime,

This has nothing to do with arguing whether or not a cell phone that rings deserves a "contempt of court" charge. I happen to think that a)judges shouldn't be soft on illegal immigration, and b)judges shouldn't be soft on 'contempt of court'. Even if the judges are inconsistent in their rulings on these matters, the positions aren't themselves inconsistent. Why can't you comprehend this?

If a murderer comes out and says that murder should stay illegal, are you going to call him a hypocrite and demand the murder be legalized because he is hypocritical? No, because being a hypocrite has nothing to do with the validity of the position.

Likewise, you would do well to argue against or for the merits of the "contempt of court" charge for the cellphone, rather than somehow try to steer things down the "two wrongs make a right" argument.