This is my last post to you on this thread. You keep making statements that don't make any sense. For many dimocrats, Dean was an extremely important candidate. While you and I may agreee that he was a "lunatic, you cannot deny that he had great influence over many voters.
Your counter arguments are becoming weaker and weaker. First, you say Rush doesn't have any influence. Then when his influence is pointed out, you claim the person influenced is a "lunatic." You remind me of a person who has to keep changing his arguments to justify his position.
I'll be watching for you on the next Rush thread.
"While you and I may agreee that he was a "lunatic, you cannot deny that he had great influence over many voters."
Correct, Dean had the influence - Dean simply used Rush as a target to focus his supporters - If Rush did not exist, Dean would have used the next recognizable name on the list.