Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: Expos to Be Renamed Nationals
AP ^ | 11/19/04 | JOSEPH WHITE

Posted on 11/19/2004 8:52:27 PM PST by nypokerface

WASHINGTON - The Montreal Expos are about to get their new name: the Washington Nationals. A city official and a baseball official, both speaking on condition of anonymity, said Friday that the team will reveal its new name, cap and red-white-and-blue color scheme during a news conference Monday.

The search for a new name began Sept. 29, when Major League Baseball announced it planned to relocate the team for the 2005 season. Initially, the plan was to wait until the team was sold to select the name, but the sale process is expected to take months — and the team needs to start marketing itself in its new home city immediately.

The top contenders were Nationals, Senators and Grays, with Senators the sentimental favorite. The original American League Senators played in the nation's capital from 1901-60 before moving to Minnesota to become the Twins. The expansion Senators called Washington home from 1961-71 before moving to Texas to become the Rangers. Senators was also the preference of commissioner Bud Selig, even though the Rangers still hold the rights to the name.

But Mayor Anthony Williams objected, saying the name isn't appropriate, given the District of Columbia's lack of representation in the U.S. Senate.

"We don't have senators here," the mayor said in September. "Give us two senators, and I'll be happy to call them the Senators."

Williams preferred the Grays, a tribute to the Homestead Grays, a Negro League team that played many of its games in Washington in the 1930s and 1940s. Historians, however, noted that the Grays' real home was Pittsburgh.

The compromise was Nationals. The Nationals, or Nats, was considered the original official nickname of the 1901-60 team. But fans instead adopted Senators, which was the name of two National League teams in Washington in the late 1800s.

Baseball owners still must approve the move. They delayed a vote when they met Thursday but said one will take place by Dec. 6. The relocation is also contingent on the D.C. government enacting legislation by Dec. 31 to finance a new ballpark.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: nypokerface

Memories of the now defunct Montreal Expos.

I remember the team playing after the 1976 Olympics with the warning track being the running track.

NY Mets slugger Dave Kingman knocking out the roof lights and getting the ball stuck...ruled a HR. Changed rule book for doomed stadiums.

Gary Carter.

Mookie Wilson.

The Spaceman.

And that's about it.


21 posted on 11/20/2004 2:13:10 AM PST by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

How about the Washington Warlords


22 posted on 11/20/2004 2:52:16 AM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sully777
How could you possibly forget Rusty Staub, Le Grande Orange?
23 posted on 11/20/2004 5:19:30 AM PST by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

The Nationals was the team's official name off and on from 1900 to 1960. As for the mayor's point, he should consider the fact that having Washington's senators play baseball rather than deliberate in Congress in itself underscores how DC does not have any senators in Congress. Besides, won't the team get new owners soon who will surely have a say in the new name?


24 posted on 11/20/2004 6:44:24 AM PST by polemarchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sully777

Andre Dawson
Tim Raines
and my favorite,
John Bacabella!

I have a terrible Montreal Expos group at MSN. Guess I will have to change the name!


25 posted on 11/20/2004 9:39:36 AM PST by willienolan (Ontario Bush(er))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: polemarchus

OK, they don't want to use the name Senators because Washington doesn't have any senators in the U.S. Congress...so why not call the team the Non-voting Delegates?


26 posted on 11/21/2004 10:33:38 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Washington Nationals is a better name than the old Washington Senators. We know that senators wouldn't show up for the games, or they'd be filibustering for something or other.


27 posted on 11/21/2004 10:35:25 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib; polemarchus; All

Question: Do the NL players wear National on their uniforms and AL wear American on their uniforms during the MLB All-Star Game? Might cause some sonfusion.


28 posted on 11/21/2004 10:43:34 AM PST by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson