Replies

You like its purpose, and therefore, since you worship your own flickering desires, you deem it worthy.

That is quite the logical jump there. To be quite honest it is a logical jump that is false and shows that you are not listening to his argument at all. You cannot say that simply because he opposed your measure of government control and restriction on pornography that he is obsessed with it and is totally controlled by his desires. Have you considered that he may fear the potential ramifications of government regulating on free speech? Have you considered the fact that he may think there is a more effective way to stop pornography? No, you haven't, you have undeservedly wrote him off as some lunatic porn addict who does not want his vice taken away. I think you are cheapening this debate with that rhetoric and in all honestly making your side look bad. My advice to you would be to present your case in a more effective manner that does not make hasty and possibly erroneous assumptions about some one.

Read my comment above. I've made many rational and reasonable arguments on this thread, and so have others. But people who irrationally support pornography can't hear them.