Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Long Cut

Why do you ignore the wisdom of your betters? (I'm referring to the gentlemen I quoted above.)

Impressionable minds of young people - say up to 18 - need protection from rampant pornography. Porn should be hard to obtain, not hard to avoid.


467 posted on 11/25/2004 2:02:05 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
Number one, while those gentlemen were unquestionably wise and learned, you'll forgive me for not considering them my "betters".

Number two, it is my right to disagree with them on those points.

Number three, you haven't answered my question.

As to people under 18, the law already has provisions regarding their exposure to pornography. After that, it is up to their parents, not the government, to regulate what they see.

It is hard to avoid Leftist propaganda, too. Should we thus ban or "control" it, because we do not like it or disagree with it?

You are under NO coercion to use pornography if you choose not to, and you are perfectly able to protect your children from it. What you want is to control OTHER people. Don't be surprised if those others disagree with letting you. They have reason to believe that you won't stop there.

468 posted on 11/25/2004 2:10:19 PM PST by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson