They need to be more specific about what they're talking about. Child pornography, where a small, obviously young child is shown with having sex with adults should be pursued relentlessly and the perpetrators given the maximum penalty.
If, on the other hand, a woman or man is of the age of consent and can sign legally binding contracts on their own to perform in a pornographic movie or other medium, so what? As long as nobody's getting hurt, and there are no underage children involved, who cares?
A disturbingly large number on both the far left and far right.
In this case the pornography would be the evidence of a crime, i.e. photographs or films of child abuse, nicht war?