Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm actually a little bit surprised that Rall got dropped by the Washington Post online website, considering how liberal the Post is in general.

Maybe even the Post editors felt Rall's creations are too over the top for their readers?

1 posted on 11/19/2004 7:12:12 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: RayChuang88

Rall was dropped because of his disgusting racist cartoon about Condi Rice. The WashPost could care less about flyover country being portrayed as mentally retarded.


30 posted on 11/19/2004 8:44:58 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88

"Ted Rall does very interesting work," Feaver said. "Some of it is not funny to an awful lot of people"

Even though they dropped his comic strip, they still don't get it. Rall is not a satirist, his work is just thinly veiled hate. He's just not funny. Even if I was a leftie I would say the same thing.


31 posted on 11/19/2004 9:09:32 AM PST by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88
I guess this means that Ted Rall's trash might still appear in the print version of the WP. So what is the WP accomplishing here? Are they just trying to stop whipping up us rednecks out here in the hinterland? Y'know, us hicks who might not be sophisticated enough to 'get' what Ted's point is?
32 posted on 11/19/2004 9:15:06 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88

Circulation was down 10% at the Washington Post (before the audit?). Ted Rall helped speed that decline, as well as the migration from Old Media to New Media by those seeking timely and reliable news reporting.


33 posted on 11/19/2004 11:37:28 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88

Rall and about a dozen other are nationaly syndicated while their material isn't fit for street newpaper, IMHO.


34 posted on 11/19/2004 11:59:56 AM PST by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88
"Ted Rall does very interesting work," Feaver said. "Some of it is not funny to an awful lot of people. We decided at the end of the day that it just did not fit the tone we wanted at WashingtonPost.com."

Translation..........."the election is over, we lost despite everything we did. It is now time to reassess our methods."

35 posted on 11/19/2004 12:02:31 PM PST by Cold Heat (There is more to do! "Mr. Kerry, about that Navy discharge?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88; .45MAN

This makes me very happy. I have had the displeasure of communicating with this idiot via email. We went back and forth several times over a cartoon in which he depicted President Bush as a Nazi. This was shortly after 9/11 and having to do with Rall's displeasure over the Patriot Act.

In typical liberal fashion, he just kept repeating buzzwords and soundbites, none of it terribly intelligent and all of it aggravating and condescending.

Thank God that the people have spoken and *someone* (The Washington Post - I'll be darned!) is listening.


36 posted on 11/19/2004 12:46:49 PM PST by dansangel (Thank you Veterans past and present!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson