My fetus, I mean my sister is a 7 month preemie, I know well the issue...
The so-called pro-choice'ers are not even open to conversation and thereby disqualifies them as rational. My hope is the pro-lifers would not be so silly.. Barring a revolution this issue will not be settled by having irrational fits, but by patient argument. Because the left has brain washed the sheeple into accepting virtual murder with the same arguments slavery was sold by.
You open to revolution (I am), most are NOT.. To make any headway reality suggests patient persuasion.. otherwise pro-lifers will be relegated to the nutso fringe when its the other side that is nutz.. Negotiation or revolution, your choice.. I can do either but still have my druthers.. But life will be lost either way.. Adult life or baby life is still life and both should be revered.. Revolution is bloody and abortion is bloody..
Let's put this into a different perspective, and then judge the rationality:
If you, as a by-stander, were asked to converse with a terrorist who was about to hack the head off a hostage, what would you find to converse about?
What possible avenue of discourse could you take that would appease him and save the hostage when his purpose for being there is to hack off his head?
The purpose of an abortionist is to kill the unborn baby.
The baby is a hostage in it's mother's body, no less than the hostages we have seen forfeited for some sick desire to kill other human beings.
I don't know which is most painful - to have your head hacked off or to have it punctured and the brains sucked out.
In either case, the hostage is dead, and that's what makes conversation meaningless in both cases.