Skip to comments.
Space Elevator Climbs at MIT
Space.com ^
| 11/17/04
| Leonard David
Posted on 11/17/2004 8:02:57 PM PST by Brett66
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
1
posted on
11/17/2004 8:02:57 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
I think that's just amazing that I'll see such an advancement in my lifetime.
2
posted on
11/17/2004 8:04:34 PM PST
by
Commander8
(Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
To: RightWhale; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; Centurion2000; ..
They actually built and tested a cable crawler, very interesting.

LiftPort's scale model of a robot lifter successfully made its way up a tether at MIT's Cecil and Ida Green Building.
Credit: Tom Nugent/LiftPort
3
posted on
11/17/2004 8:05:25 PM PST
by
Brett66
(W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1)
To: Brett66
4
posted on
11/17/2004 8:05:49 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: Brett66
I read other news that firms are working to construct these during this century. I just can't imagine something that was science fiction to be reality in a few decades. Thanks to the technology of nanotubes that will contribute to the project.
5
posted on
11/17/2004 8:07:36 PM PST
by
Wiz
To: daughterofTGSL
To: Plutarch
Looks like a good start. Only 22,235 miles,4,280 feet more to go.
7
posted on
11/17/2004 8:08:47 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
To: Brett66
You beat me to that image. Here is another graphic:
8
posted on
11/17/2004 8:09:00 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
I think I read somewhere that they figured out how to make long strands of nanotubes a couple of months ago.
9
posted on
11/17/2004 8:10:33 PM PST
by
Brett66
(W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1)
To: Commander8
I know, it is just such an thinking outside the box idea. Who knows if it will work. Amazing to think about.
To: Commander8
Wow, we made it 10 posts on a space elevator thread without some pants-wetter whining that it would be a terrorist target. Progress, I think.
To: Strategerist
I think it's commonly misunderstood to be a tower that stands under its own weight, rather than a tension wire that's pulled up into space. "Tower = target" is stuck in peoples' minds.
To: Plutarch
Where can I find more on these tests and where can I find these photos related to it?
13
posted on
11/17/2004 8:26:36 PM PST
by
perfect stranger
("Going to war without France is like going duck hunting wothout your accordian")
To: Strategerist
No need to worry about terrorists; it will never be built, it won't work. Once these MIT students start doing the math, they'll realize that.
John Jamieson MIT XVI (aero/astro) '67, NASA 67-94 retired
14
posted on
11/17/2004 8:28:08 PM PST
by
John Jamieson
(Hybrids are a highway around CAFE, that's all they're good for.)
To: Commander8
Gen 11:4
And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top [may reach] unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
15
posted on
11/17/2004 8:30:30 PM PST
by
hookman
To: Plutarch
I think I found the article, University of Kentucky demonstrated a process that made nanofibers 3 miles long.
Space Elevator
16
posted on
11/17/2004 8:33:30 PM PST
by
Brett66
(W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1)
To: hookman
And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top [may reach] unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.It's not a tower. It's a ribbon under tension caused by outward centripetal force.
To: John Jamieson
I only survived two years at MIT before I transferred out, so I don't know enough to know it won't work :-)
Thing about terrorism is that I can't think of anything easier to defend from terrorists than some platform out in the Pacific Ocean on the Equator.
To: John Jamieson
Where does the idea fail?
To: Rebelbase
Looks like a good start. Only 22,235 miles,4,280 feet more to go. And millions of bits of existing satelites to be removed from orbits below, that are statisticly certian to smack the tether at some time or other. Particularly since it doesn't just occupy a single point in an orbit, but is along a 22k+ mile line.
The question is more like, how many times will it be struck per hour.
It'll never be built, materials science improvements notwithstanding. This is just a science boondoggle, just like studying global warming. (come to think of it, I'd rather have them study this, because at least the raw science is constructive instead of destructive)
20
posted on
11/17/2004 8:43:57 PM PST
by
narby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson