So as we conclude this *ahem* discussion, let me sum up:
You believe the thousands of scientific studies about the efficacy of prayer to be false, even though they point to the same conclusion.
Therefore, there is some Science with which you agree, based on evidence derived from the scientific method, and there is some Science with which you disagree, despite the evidence derived from the scientific method.
What, then, is it about the "evolutionist" scientific method that is so superior over other scientists and their scientific method?
You are ignoring what is inconvenient to your point of view, aren't you?
You believe the thousands of scientific studies about the evolution to be false, even though they point to the same conclusion.
Therefore, there is some Science with which you agree, based on evidence derived from the scientific method, and there is some Science with which you disagree, despite the evidence derived from the scientific method.
What, then, is it about the "prayer" scientific method that is so superior over other scientists and their scientific method?
You are ignoring what is inconvenient to your point of view, aren't you?